If I were a Marxist leader in America trying to eradicate freedom and liberty established in America’s founding documents, I would, well, keep pushing the same supposed “Progressive” agenda cast upon Americans since the early 1900′s. Every grand step in that Progressive wonderland has followed lockstep with Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, as you can read here. Unfortunately, for the Marxists in America, this agenda, once fully recognized and experienced by free Americans, would surely be soundly rejected. Right? However, the Marxist’s partnership with Fabian Socialists has allowed for this freedom-choking agenda to be introduced through incrementalism and most victims of this transformation are sold this bill of goods through the mantra of “progress”. And, of course, who wants to stand in the way of “progress? You’re not a hater are you? In a nutshell, Americans would not tolerate the implementation of Communism or Marxism willingly. We were given, through our Bill of Rights, the means in which to combat such a Marxist takeover of our Democratic Representative Republic. It’s called our 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. Seeing that America has elected a very Marxist-leaning President, his latest move to curtail American’s 2nd Amendment right is “progressing” nicely. The gun-grabbing supporters of this President claim they want to “protect the children” and that the latest mandates introduced are soft measures to keep guns out of the hands the crazies. Nothing serious right? Well, in looking at past Communist government’s efforts to break its citizen’s resistance to Communism, gun ownership was banned or severely limited. An outright firearm ownership ban in America will not be tolerated by the American people, so limiting gun ownership would have to suffice. So if I were a Marxist, I would expand the definition of “mental illness” infinitely, as to make sure to label anyone (except the special people) mentally ill.
Archive for the ‘ Out of Control Goverment ’ Category
Voter-Id Propaganda – Progressives Protect Themselves By Representing Illegal Aliens and Stupid PeopleAuthor: Al
So really, what’s all the fuss about securing a state’s ability to conduct accurate and fair elections. All over an ID requirement. Since the Progressive America-destroyers detest the idea of requiring an Id to engage in a right guaranteed in our Constitution, let’s drop the Id requirement for another right guaranteed in our U.S. Constitution – the right to bear arms. I’m afraid you’ll die of old age before the Progressives come around on that.
My conclusion to this opposition on voter Id laws is, allowing illegal aliens, the clueless and ignorant, and the easily misled to vote is only a machination of those who need these groups to get elected. Showing an Id to vote is merely common sense and that definitely goes against the mindset of a Progressive America-destroyer.
You thought Americans would be about done supporting activity antithetical to America’s existence as a free country. It appears people will continue to support those who prefer government-controlled everything versus free enterprise and freedom. This past week was presented with much news that is just plain bizarre. If Americans continue to hold their taxpayer-funded elected officials and government employees harmless for not putting America first, then, yes, we deserve what we get. Unfortunately, for those of us who choose to fight, we’re obviously surrounded by the “walking dead” who refuse to be responsible enough to stand up for America and her exceptionalism. Please wake up your neighbors from their slumber and encourage them to stand up and fight against those who prefer America be to be transformed into another “failed European social experiment”.
Just remember, the (D) and (R) game is no different than that fake “wrastling” match on TV, where the winners and losers are decided ahead of time. Then after the show, they all go have drinks together and laugh at how stupid and gullible Americans are, while planning tomorrows’ theatrics.
For the few of us that really care about America’s survival, it’s time to find who the directors of this fiction theater are and take them out.
CISPA – House Members Pay Homage To Their Corporate Masters With Another Dressed-up Copyright Enforcement LawAuthor: Al
I’m not thrilled about linking to Russia Times for news. However, the major media outlets (“Media Infotainment Industrial Complex”) biased propaganda drives one to dig hard for some accurate commentary on the CISPA law introduced by a Republican and a Democrat.
Obviously, this is another attempt by House members to place American taxpayers on the hook for Federal Government-provided law enforcement beneficial to “for-profit” industries. This is more of the same crony capitalism that is slowly squeezing the lifeblood from America.
ABC news ran a “buried” story about this new attempt by House members to slide this one under the radar. Too bad this wasn’t covered on their nightly news broadcast.
The House Intelligence Committee approved the bill in a secret session held one day after the bill was introduced and without a single public hearing on the legislation.
So why is the House leadership trumpeting the Rogers bill and why are so many companies lining up to support it? For companies, the answer is easy: there is freedom to share information with whatever entity you please, blanket immunity for sharing, blanket immunity for a recipient of shared cybersecurity information who fails to take protective measures even when they are clearly needed, and no regulatory burdens are imposed. For House leadership, the answer seems to be that it is not listening to Internet users. Perhaps it’s time for us to speak more loudly.
A cybersecurity law should only authorize sharing of cybersecurity threat information for cybersecurity purposes, including prosecuting cybersecurity crimes. Without that limitation, info sharing could become a backdoor wiretap. Here the Rogers bill is the biggest risk; it permits information shared for cybersecurity reasons to be used for any national security purpose and to prosecute any crime.
And even Yahoo ran a subdued story about this legislation, but one line was eye-catching.
The criticism that, by including a provision for the protection of intellectual property, CISPA is little more than a less-conspicuous form of the draconian SOPA bill
Put your Congressman’s feet to the fire and demand a no-vote to H.R. 3523, crony corporatist legislation.
Brought to you by www.freemarketamerica.org
Back in the first Gilded Age following the Civil War, with its huge concentration of wealth at the top and abject misery at the bottom, Boies Penrose was a United States Senator from Pennsylvania bought and paid for by the railroad tycoons and oil barons.
They could count on him to deliver the goods. “I believe in the division of labor,” he told his wealthy paymasters. “You send us to Congress; we pass laws under which you make money…and out of your profits you further contribute to our campaign fund to send us back again to pass more laws to enable you to make more money.”
Boies Penrose would be right at home in politics today. Crony capitalism – using government to deliver favors to your pals in the business world — is alive and well. The rest of us pay for it. We pay for it at the grocery store because of sweetheart deals in Congress for the dairy industry and sugar lobby. We pay for it at drug store because politicians rented by giant pharmaceutical firms block competition. We pay for it in lowered returns on pension plans bailed out banks speculate with taxpayer money. We pay with the loss of jobs because of trade deals bought and paid for by multinational companies. We pay in tax rates higher than those of the billionaires who fund the SuperPacs. And we pay in the loss of political equality, because one person, one vote means very little when those we elect do the bidding of donors instead of voters.
We’re deep now into what will be the most expensive election in our history, much of it funded by crony capitalists. So let’s hear from two people who have closely watched how cozy ties between Wall Street and Washington are perverting capitalism and subverting democracy. First, David Stockman.
In the 1970s, he was a young Republican congressman from Michigan and an early proponent of supply-side economics — some call it trickle down.