Here is the latest installment of news stories reporting the continued invasion of America and the threats to American sovereignty.

After Immigration Detainment of Auto Workers, Big Business Pressure Alabama Lawmakers To Change law

Alabama Farmers Complain To Government About Lack Of Illegal Aliens For Work

Unless Your An Illegal Alien Serial Murderer, Illegals Welcomed To Colorado’s New Pilot Program

SCOTUS Determines Whether To Take Up Arizona Immigration Law Challenge

Poll of likely caucus goers shows support for legal immigration

Liberal Maryland Rag Says GOP Voters Want Amnesty For Illegal Aliens

NY State Pput Low-ball FigureOn Illegal Immigration Student To Cost As To Be More Appealing

Illegal Aliens Chance Of Being Apprehended a Approx. 4%

MD Illegal Alien Advocates Say In-State Dream Act Cannot Be Put To Reforendum

NM Governor Tries For A 3rd Time To Repeal Law Allowing Divers Licenses For Illegal Aliens

Weed, Cash, Human Smugglers, and Illegal Immigrants Found During DPS Raid of Avondale Drop House

Letter: Glaring Difference Between Legal and Illegal Immigrants

Obama’s Christmas list rewards illegals

Washpo Claims National Guard Border Enforcement on Mexican Border Is A Waste Of Time and Money

Legal Immigrants Speak Out Against the Dream Act

California DREAM Act to Cost More than Originally Estimated

Oklahoma State Senator Proposes Guest Worker Program for Illegal Aliens

DOJ to Sue Utah Over Immigration Enforcement Law

Gingrich Favors Juries, But Not for Americans … Just for Illegal Aliens

Napolitano faces contempt citation over list of immigrants ICE flagged

Tea Party Nation, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), and Socialists All Oppose E-verify

Sanctuary MD County Delays Start Of Illegal Immigration Deportation Program

Obama DHS Task Group Criticizes Congressional Action On Illegal Immigration Enforcement

Mass Governor Deval Patrick, Who Rejected The Secured Communities Program, Now Needs Feds Help With llegal Immigration

U.S. Rep. Frank Guinta To Co-sponsor HALT Act Bill Preventing The Granting of Certain Rights To Illegal Immigrants

Bachmann Courts AZ’s Tough Anti-immigrant Sheriff, Arpaio

AZ Supreme Courts Sides With Pro Illegal Immigration Groups To OK Recall Election Of Tough AZ Immigration Bill Author

NM State Judge’s Actions Still Block Attempts Of NM Governor To Disallow Driver Licences To Illegals

WH Official Equates Illegal Aliens With Jaywalkers

Obama’s Illegal Immigration Amnesty and The Death of A Nation

31 Illegal Immigrants Caught in Major Bust

U.S. Border Patrol Bows To Pressure From Protesters To Release Illegal Immigrants

Illegal Aliens Rally In Support Of CA Dream Act

Illegal Immigrants Arrested at Pro-illegal Immigration Rally in Charlotte Will Not Be Turned Over For Deportation

Pro-Illegal Alien Groups’ National Day of Protest Against Mandatory E-Verify Announced

Students Protest Ga. University System Immigration Policy

Catholic Groups Protest NM Governor’s Illegal Immigration Crackdown

Hopefully, this will promote more states’ actions holding businesses accountable for hiring illegal aliens. Here are some stories from this past week regarding the ramifications of the SCOTUS ruling.

The first is a quote from an opinion piece written by AZ lawmaker, Russell Pearce, a key actor in precipitating the SCOTUS case by The US Chamber of Commerce.

Supreme Court Sides With AZ In Use Of Employment Verification Hailed By AZ Lawmaker

By Russell Pearce, guest commentary East Valley Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court has handed our great state a significant victory. It upheld our 2007 law penalizing businesses for knowingly hiring workers who are here illegally.

No longer will companies be able to ignore the rule of law and hire illegal aliens, shutting out legal Arizona workers. With the highest unemployment in a generation, we must do all we can to get Arizona back to work, and this ruling means those here legally will not have to compete with the illegal crowd. That is great news.

Gov. Haley accuses feds of making it difficult for the state to identify illegal workers

Immigration Measure Approved By South Carolina House

Justices’ Arizona Ruling on Illegal Immigration May Embolden States

Nancy L. Wild: Kudos to Pridemore for immigrant proposalv

Department of Homeland Security Daily Media Update May 27, 2011:

Time for Jersey to catch up with Arizona on immigration

ACLU Files Suit Over Indiana Immigration Laws

TX Illegal Immigration Bills Scrapped Under Pressure From Business Community To Maintain A Steady Flow of Affordable Labor To Highly Influential Industries

Pro-Illegal Immigration Groups Continue Recall Efforts For Legislators Wanting To Crack Down On Illegal immigration

Florida Illegal Immigration Efforts Buckle From Pressure From Influential Big Business

Reforms to target illegals in S.C.

Big Business Up In Arms Over State’s Illegal Immigration Enforcements

Tom Tancredo – The Republican silence on illegal immigration

Rep. Heath Shuler Reintroduces Bi-Partisan SAVE Act

The odd issue with this case rests with the fact that the “big business advocate”, The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce”, doesn’t want business held accountable for hiring illegal aliens. It makes you question  the Chamber’s allegiance to America’s sovereignty. I’m afraid it’s all about the money and illegal immigration is a boon for big business as more legal Americans become unemployed and are unable to find gainful employment.

The system is being gamed by big business  -  through deception, they financially support politicians who promote anti-illegal immigration legislation, while themselves hiring the same illegal aliens these politicians are targeting.

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL. v. WHITING ET AL. (find the entire case at supremecourt.gov)

The Chamber of Commerce of the United States and various business and civil rights organizations (collectively Chamber) filed this federal preenforcement suit against those charged with administer-ing the Arizona law, arguing that the state law’s license suspensionand revocation provisions were both expressly and impliedly pre-empted by federal immigration law, and that the mandatory use of E-Verify was impliedly preempted.

Arizona’s requirement that employers use E-Verify is not impliedlypreempted. The IIRIRA provision setting up E-Verify contains no language circumscribing state action. It does, however, constrain federal action: absent a prior violation of federal law, “the Secretaryof Homeland Security may not require any person or . . . entity” out-side the Federal Government “to participate in” E-Verify. IIRIRA, §402(a), (e). The fact that the Federal Government may require the use of E-Verify in only limited circumstances says nothing aboutwhat the States may do. The Government recently argued just thatin another case and approvingly referenced Arizona’s law as an ex-ample of a permissible use of E-Verify when doing so.

Moreover, Arizona’s use of E-Verify does not conflict with the fed-eral scheme. The state law requires no more than that an employer, after hiring an employee, “verify the employment eligibility of theemployee” through E-Verify. Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §23–214(A). And the consequences of not using E-Verify are the same under the state and federal law—an employer forfeits an otherwise available rebut-table presumption of compliance with the law.

So another bunch of progressives want to stop the use of the word “illegal aliens” because it’s offensive. As reported by cultureandmediainstitute.com

The label “remains offensive to Latinos, and especially Mexicans, and to the fundamentals of American jurisprudence,” wrote Leo E. Laurence, a member of the SPJ Diversity Committee and the editor the San Diego News Service (which appears to be this blog that was last updated in August, 2009…Laurence argues that the terms “undocumented immigrant” or “undocumented worker” should replace “illegal immigrant,” because the U.S. legal system presumes that one is innocent until proven guilty.

These idiots like to imagine that U.N. mandates trump America’s Constitution. Dream on progressives. First, if these illegals decided to enter America legally, we wouldn’t even be discussing this. Second, why should illegals (non-citizens) be afforded the rights of our legal citizens. Third, no how many times you try change the meaning of the word, the bottom line is they are illegal. Ok, lets just call them criminals and see how they like that.

I’ll just stick to illegal alien – ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN, ALIEN, ILLEGAL ALIEN,

Hmm, I wonder what constituency she is pandering to here?  It must be the legal U.S. relatives of the illegals.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently told a group of both legal and illegal immigrants and their families that enforcement of existing immigration laws, as currently practiced, is “un-American.”

The speaker, condemning raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, referred to the immigrants she was addressing as “very, very patriotic.”

“Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent away from their families?” Pelosi told a mostly Hispanic gathering at St. Anthony’s Church in San Francisco. link